Poor Dan Margolies Draws Short Straw, Forced To Report Own Furlough

newsofstarsfurloughsOne of the worst things about working for The Sinking Ship That Is McClatchy has to be reporting on your own setbacks. (And we should note that our friends over at McClatchy Watch cover this way better than we ever could.) Sadly, the job of reporting today’s furlough news fell to reporter Dan Margolies, who had to do a written Bataan Death March and pen the story of his own involuntary break.

Besides the furloughs, the newspaper will also offer voluntary buyouts to most of its regular full-time workers, Zieman told employees in a memo. He said no target had been set, “but we expect it to be considerably less than the last round of involuntary cuts.” Zieman also said that The Star’s parent company, Sacramento, Calif.-based McClatchy Co., is extending the current wage freeze for all employees through December.

But wait, what’s this?

McClatchy, which owns 30 daily newspapers, last month more than doubled its second-quarter earnings, from $19.7 million in 2008 to $42.2 million, largely owing to extensive cost cutting.

Cut all the expenses you want, McClatchy, but that’s not a path to profitability. Listen to Murdoch’s words last week on News Corp.’s payment scheme: Quality journalism is not cheap, and an industry that gives away its content is simply cannibalizing its ability to produce good reporting. The digital revolution has opened many new and inexpensive distribution channels but it has not made content free. We intend to charge for all our news Web sites.

The Star and other publications need to realize they can’t continue to cut the people who write the news while giving away the news for free. How much did I pay to use the excerpt above? Zero. Information doesn’t want to be free, as Gladwell recently noted — the people who make money off information want it to be free. Furloughs are newspapers’ bridges to nowhere.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Economics, Media

One response to “Poor Dan Margolies Draws Short Straw, Forced To Report Own Furlough

  1. JS

    The problem with charging for information is that you have to have something that no one else can get. I see where newspapers have columnists who they have control over but how can they control news? There is going to be free information out there that anyone on the internet will go get. It would be like trying to stop a million leaks in a dam. It is not possible. Somebody will do it for free and those who charge will be left with those who want only that information source. Why pay when you can get it for free? Economics will be the deciding factor in whether newspapers as we know them survive or not. If their is no perceived value then no one will pay for them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s